Re: NULLS and User Input WAS Re: multimaster
| От | Alexander Staubo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: NULLS and User Input WAS Re: multimaster |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 88daf38c0706040803u161d9d74t20e9e1876afc767d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: NULLS and User Input WAS Re: multimaster (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Re: NULLS and User Input WAS Re: multimaster
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 6/4/07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:37:42AM +0200, PFC wrote: > > NULL usually means "unknown" or "not applicable" > > Aaaargh! No, it doesn't. It means NULL. Nothing else. > > If it meant unknown or not applicable or anything else, then > > SELECT * FROM nulltbl a, othernulltbl b > WHERE a.nullcol = b.nullcol > > would return rows where a.nullcol contained NULL and b.nullcol > contained NULL. But it doesn't, because !(NULL = NULL). I don't disagree with the principle, but that's a specious argument. Who says (unknown = unknown) should equal true? Alexander.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: