Re: Slightly OT.
От | Alexander Staubo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slightly OT. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 88daf38c0706011644o1852e0bdqa0fdc4072508abfa@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slightly OT. (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slightly OT.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 6/2/07, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > Here is some work going on that looks like what you want: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg00050.php I had no idea someone was working on WAL-log-based replication; I saw the TODO entry a while ago, but I missed the thread. I think WAL replication is a beautiful idea, so I'll gladly throw my support behind this. Thanks for the pointer. > You might also seriously consider PgPool-II. pgpool-II seems like a decent idea. I'm not sure if the partitioning can support referential integrity though -- would they have to be declared as CHECK constraints that used dblink()? Also, it doesn't seem capable of planning a query intelligently, which means that a query such as "select * from foo where id = 123" is going to be aggregated across all nodes even though only one node has the partition covering the id range [0, 1000], say. Alexander.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: