Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Include foreign tables ininformation_schema.table_privileges
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Include foreign tables ininformation_schema.table_privileges |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 88bfa467-fe33-2a91-bd80-b269dd44095b@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Include foreign tables in information_schema.table_privileges (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/16/17 07:27, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> Include foreign tables in information_schema.table_privileges >> >> This appears to have been an omission in the original commit >> 0d692a0dc9f. All related information_schema views already include >> foreign tables. >> >> Reported-by: Nicolas Thauvin <nicolas.thauvin@dalibo.com> > > I would have been disinclined to back-patch this. Somebody could be > depending on the current behavior, and now we'll end up with two kinds > of clusters, one where initdb was done before these changes and > another where it was done afterward. So nobody will be able to count > on this behavior one way or the other. I understand that. But this is an additive change, so to speak, so whatever behavior someone was relying on should continue to work. I did not backpatch 9b5140fb503eb50634cd7e080d41f4d9af41e0a6 because that is a behavior-breaking change. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: