Re: More Praise for 7.4RC2
От | jake@omnimode.com (jake johnson) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More Praise for 7.4RC2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8897a0de.0311120904.1d10900f@posting.google.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | More Praise for 7.4RC2 (Reece Hart <reece@in-machina.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: More Praise for 7.4RC2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
reece@in-machina.com (Reece Hart) wrote in message news:<1068597494.28850.266.camel@tallac>... [...snip...] > The cost estimates give the right qualitative feel. 7.3.4 took >30 > minutes for this query whereas 7.4RC2 responds essentially > instantaneously. > [...snip...] I also posted about the performance increase of 7.4, but I think that much of the difference you're seeing (because it's such a large difference) is probably due to the cleanliness of a newly restored database from backup. Perhaps a vacuum analyze could have improved that 30+ minute response time on 7.3.4. I too posted about the performance improvement, seeing about 200% at first after restoring from backup. After some transactions, however, I'd say its more like 100% - 125% improvement. I'm still particularly impressed with the improvement in the select count(*) query performance, which is about 100% improved.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: