Re: pgbench duration option
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench duration option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8861.1219105120@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgbench duration option (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench duration option
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Greg Smith wrote: >> Last time I tried to quantify the overhead of logging with timestamps on >> I couldn't even measure its impact, it was lower than the usual pgbench >> noise. > There's a hardware deficiency on certain machines -- I think it's old > ones. I don't know if machines that would currently be used in > production would contain such a problem. My understanding is that it's basically "cheap PC hardware" (with clock interfaces based on old ISA bus specs) that has the issue in a significant way. I wouldn't expect you to see it on a serious database server. But lots of people still do development on cheap PC hardware, which is why I think this is worth worrying about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: