Re: Another seq scan instead of index question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another seq scan instead of index question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8841.997208721@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Another seq scan instead of index question (Nicholas Piper <nick@nickpiper.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Nicholas Piper <nick@nickpiper.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, 07 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: >> Your real problem is the bogus selectivity estimate. What version >> are you running? If 7.0, see contrib/likeplanning/. If 7.1, I'd >> be interested to see what you get from > I'm on 7.1 > (PostgreSQL 7.1.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.95.4) Okay ... [ looks at code ... ] oh, I see the problem. The pattern-match selectivity code doesn't try to deal with "lower(foo) LIKE ...": /* * If expression is not var op constant for * a simple var of a real relation (no subqueries, for now), * then punt and return a default estimate. */ This could probably be improved, but I don't have time to think about it now. In the meantime you could try knocking DEFAULT_MATCH_SEL down a little bit. (It's already been reduced to 0.005 in current sources, in fact.) See src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: