Re: Alternative to \copy in psql modelled after \g
От | Daniel Verite |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alternative to \copy in psql modelled after \g |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 881c25d2-0a15-4e50-a175-738056146973@manitou-mail.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alternative to \copy in psql modelled after \g ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alternative to \copy in psql modelled after \g
Re: Alternative to \copy in psql modelled after \g |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > I admit that if we could improve \g to handle COPY, it would be more > elegant than the current proposal adding two meta-commands. > > But the copy-workflow and non-copy-workflow are different, and in > order to know which one to start, \g would need to analyze the query It turns out I was wrong on this. The workflows are different but when psql receives the first PGresult, it's still time to handle the I/O redirection. It just differs from \copy in the case of an error: \copy won't even send a command to the server if the local output stream can't be opened, whereas COPY \g would send the command, and will have to deal with the client-side error afterwards. Well, except that up to now, COPY ... TO STDOUT \g file or \g |command has been ignoring "file" or "|command", which is arguably a bug as Tom puts it in another discussion in [1]. So as a replacement for the \copyto I was proposing earlier, PFA a patch for COPY TO STDOUT to make use of the argument to \g. [1] bug #15535 https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6309.1544031175@sss.pgh.pa.us Best regards, -- Daniel Vérité PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org Twitter: @DanielVerite
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: