Re: Constant time insertion into highly non-unique indexes
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Constant time insertion into highly non-unique indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 881.1113491709@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Constant time insertion into highly non-unique (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Constant time insertion into highly non-unique
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The move right only occurs when the page is full, so the chance of
> moving right is not 0.99^250, but 0.99, since the previous 249 inserts
> would not cause a page split.
Sure, but given that we have a full page, the probability that 250
successive insertions *all* decide to move right rather than split
that page is 0.99^250. And it only takes one decision to split to
maintain the constant-time behavior. So I still think your analysis
is incorrect.
> IMHO the performance figures show this to be true.
*What* performance figures? You have shown none. We did do performance
testing of this algorithm when we adopted it, and it worked fine ---
though as I say, I don't think we tested with any very wide keys.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: