Re: Protection of intellectual property (Schema & SQL code)
| От | Jason Earl |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Protection of intellectual property (Schema & SQL code) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87zo22eacr.fsf@npa01zz001.simplot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Protection of intellectual property (Schema & SQL (wsheldah@lexmark.com) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
wsheldah@lexmark.com writes: > I agree with Jason that you can't really prevent them from getting > to the schema, unless you become an Application Service Provider and > host the application on your own hardware at your business, and they > connect over a network to it. Of course, then you would want to > charge them a subscription for continued use of the service, and be > prepared to assume responsibility for backups, uptime, etc. Yes, it is much better to market this sort of thing as a service. A competent Systems Administrator would rather be poked in the eye than be responsible for a system that they can't back up. If you want to keep your customers data out of their hands, then the least you can do is be resposible for the backups. > One thing you could do just to "tag" it would be to add a prefix or > suffix to all the tables. Say you work for "A Better Company, Inc.", > then you might name all your tables things like abc_customer and > abc_order, etc. The only thing that would help with is if you find > someone else running a copy, it may be easier to prove that it's > your schema. Of course they could change the names, but they would > run the risk of breaking functionality if they don't do it right, > plus you can hardcode the names in your front-end application. If > you can compile the front-end such that you only provide them with a > binary executable, it will be that much harder to change the > names. And you may have better luck using other copy-protection > mechanisms with the front end. If you are going to get mean. Why not simply write your application so that it calls home every once in a while. It can then check your database to see if its secret serial number is valid, and if it isn't, or if there is a duplicate it shuts itself down. Good luck signing customers up for that sort of a deal. > I wish you well, I don't. I hate applications that won't share data. I especially hate applications that require some sort of secret handshake to backup properly. As a developer I believe that developers should get paid, but as a former systems administrator I also believe that applications that make it hard for an admin to do his or her job are evil. There has *got* to be a better way to get your customers to pay you. Jason
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: