Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87zno1gofs.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > Personally ... as long as a v8.x client can talk to a v7.x backend, you > have my vote ... I'm more apt to upgrade my clients before my servers > anyway ... Surely that's not true for a production environment. You have one database but potentially dozens of various programs around that access it. The main application, some backend scripts for batch jobs, your backup process, your monitoring systems... Not all of these are necessarily on the same machine. It's upgrading the database that's likely to be the driving motivation for new sql or storage features. People usually don't get excited about upgrading the client libraries :) -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: