Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87y980tvc4.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? ("Henrik Steffen" <steffen@city-map.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Henrik Steffen" <steffen@city-map.de> writes: > > - What do the clients connect with? JDBC/ODBC/libpq/etc? > I am using Pg.pm --- this is called libpq, isn't it? Well, it's a thin Perl wrapper over libpq (which is the C client API). You said you're using mod_perl: you may wish to consider using DBI and DBD::Pg instead of Pg.pm, so you can make use of persistent connections using Apache::DBI. > > - Have you configured the memory after installation of PostgreSQL, so > > it's better optimised than the defaults? > no - what should I do? Looking at 'top' right now, I see the following: > Mem 1020808K av, 1015840K used, 4968K free, 1356K shrd, 32852K buff No, Justin is referring to the memory-related configuration options in postgresql.conf, like shared_buffers, wal_buffers, sort_mem, and the like. > So, what do you suggest to gain more performance? IMHO, dual processors would likely be a good performance improvement. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: