Re: Block-level CRC checks
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87y706azj1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block-level CRC checks ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block-level CRC checks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Jonah H. Harris wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com> wrote: >>> Please, DO NOT MOVE position of page version in PageHeader structure! And >>> PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION should be bump to 5. >> >> Umm, any in-place upgrade should be capable of handling changes to the >> page header. Of, did I miss something significant in the in-place > > I thought that was kind of the point of in place upgrade. Sure, but he has to have a reliable way to tell what version of the page header he's looking at... What I'm wondering though -- are we going to make CRCs mandatory? Or set aside the 4 bytes even if you're not using them? Because if the size of the page header varies depending on whether you're using CRCs that sounds like it would be quite a pain. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: