Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87wtwl7bqe.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > If there are no don't-care cases, then you're effectively saying that > the first column's PickSplit has sole control over the tree shape, > which is where we're at now. ISTM the entire point of a multi-column > index is that the first column has duplicates, or at least values that > are similar enough to qualify as don't-cares. I'm not sure that GiST indexes behave the same way as btree indexes for the multi-column case. In a btree index the second column is entirely subordinate to the first column. In a GiST index the data is multi-dimensional, and all dimensions are equally important. For a concrete example, say you wanted to index a 2d cartesian coordinate. If you stored it in a single column using the point data type (or a 2 element array) then the PickSplit function can use both coordinates to determine its split. A GiST index on two separate integer columns really shouldn't be prevented from operating in the same way. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: