Re: Multiple logical databases
От | Doug McNaught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple logical databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87wtgczibe.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple logical databases ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multiple logical databases
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com> writes: > The point is, that I have been working with this sort of "use case" for a > number of years, and being able to represent multiple physical databases > as one logical db server would make life easier. It was a brainstorm I had > while I was setting this sort of system for the [n]th time. It sounds like all that would be needed is a kind of "smart proxy"--has a list of database clusters on the machine and the databases they contain, and speaks enough of the protocol to recognize the startup packet and reroute it internally to the right cluster. I've heard 'pgpool' mentioned here; from a quick look at the docs it looks similar but not quite what you want. So your databases would listen on 5433, 5434, etc and the proxy would listen on 5432 and route everything properly. If a particular cluster is not up, the proxy could just error out the connection. Hmm, that'd be fun to write if I ever find the time... -Doug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: