Re: bit string functions
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bit string functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87wsx0w3yu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bit string functions (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: bit string functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:40:18AM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote: >> I would like to make these a part of postgresql for others to use. >> Is it more appropriate for these to be in contrib code >> or part of the postgresql proper? >> How can I contribute these? > > I would say just set up a project on pgfoundry. I agree, though I think in the long term we do need a more complete set of operators and functions in core. But we need consensus on which set people find necessary and pgfoundry is a good place to do that. I think the main guiding force will be which sets of operators and functions become necessary to have operator classes for indexes. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: