Re: MySQL million tables
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL million tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87veunlnnj.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MySQL million tables (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL million tables
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, greg@turnstep.com ("Greg Sabino Mullane") wrote: > I kicked this off last night before bed. It ran much quicker than > I thought, due to that 27 hour estimate. > > Total time: 23 minutes 29 seconds :) I'm jealous. I've got the very same thing running on some Supposedly Pretty Fast Hardware, and it's cruising towards 31 minutes plus a few seconds. While it's running, the time estimate is... select (now() - '2006-03-09 13:47:49') * 1000000 / (select count(*) from pg_class where relkind='r' and relname ~ 'foo'); That pretty quickly converged to 31:0?... > Maybe I'll see just how far PG *can* go next. Time to make a > PlanetPG post, at any rate. Another interesting approach to it would be to break this into several streams. There ought to be some parallelism to be gained, on systems with multiple disks and CPUs, by having 1..100000 go in parallel to 100001 to 200000, and so forth, for (oh, say) 10 streams. Perhaps it's irrelevant parallelism; knowing that it helps/hurts would be nice... -- (format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "cbbrowne.com") http://linuxfinances.info/info/rdbms.html Where do you want to Tell Microsoft To Go Today?
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: