Re: partition insert performance
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partition insert performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87vdmov2n0.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partition insert performance (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hi, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Gurjeet Singh<singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> If you're using plpgsql prepare for a world of pain if you've got any >>> null values in your inserts. >> >> :) Using COALESCE isn't that bad. > > In my experience it's WAY more than just coalesce. There's this trick: v_sql := 'INSERT INTO schema.parent_' || to_char(NEW.date, 'YYYYMM') || ' SELECT (' || quote_literal(textin(record_out(NEW))) || '::schema.parent).*;'; EXECUTE v_sql; This will handle dynamic SQL and NULLs correctly, but as said already won't match static SQL in term of performances. Just saying for people searching simplifications. Regards, -- dim
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: