Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87tz8zkhrb.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > PostgreSQL is much less prone to serialization failures, but it is > certainly understandable if hot standby replication introduces new > cases of it. In this case it will be possible to get this error even if you're just running a single SELECT query -- and that's the *only* query in the database at all. A vacuum being replayed -- even in a different database -- could trigger the error. Or with the btree split issue, a data load -- again even in a different database -- would be quite likely cause your SELECT to be killed. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB'sPostgreSQL training!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: