Re: [ADMIN] Question about pg_xlog
От | Jerry Sievers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Question about pg_xlog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87tw5lpxho.fsf@jsievers.enova.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [ADMIN] Question about pg_xlog (M Kiesewetter <mskiesewetter@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] Question about pg_xlog
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
M Kiesewetter <mskiesewetter@gmail.com> writes: > Hi everyone, > > I'm new to Postgresql and have a test environment with Postgresql > 9.4.5 running on Linux. > Today I noticed that the pg_xlog was filled up to 18 Gb. > I have: > - wal_level=hot_standby > - wal_keep_segments = 100 > - hot_standby = on > archive_mode = on > > It's a test environment en I did a pg_resetxlogs() on the 6th of > April. > I know that I shouldn't use this, and that it's only a last resort. > When I look in de pg_xlog directory I see xlog files that are kept > sinds that time. > When i look at the archive_status directory I see that all of the > files have the suffix of .done. > All the other xlogs from the time before the resetlogs are cleaned up > as I expected. > But I don't understand why the other xlogs aren't recycled. I'd start by looking for dormant replication slots. select * from pg_replication_slots; HTH > I am looking for ways to find out why my pg_xlog is filling up. > - I checked the alertlog of the postgresql instance --> no errors > - I checked the WAL file location to see if the xlogs are being > archived --> they are present > > Are there more ways to find out why my pg_xlog is filling up? > Is the pg_resetxlogs the reason why the older xlogs are not recycled? > > I Hope that someone can help me. > Thanks in advance. > Regards, > Mariane > > > -- Jerry Sievers e: jerry.sievers@comcast.net p: 312.241.7800
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: