Re: Concurrent psql patch
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87sla07sgu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concurrent psql patch (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Concurrent psql patch
Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Список | pgsql-patches |
"Jim Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes: > I don't see how we could make the names shorter without moving away from a > backslash command (which I'm guessing would be painful). > > Assuming we're stuck with a backslash command \cs[witch] and \cn > [owait] seem to be about as good as we could get. I don't have \cs or \cn set up as abbreviations. I was originally thinking \c1, \c2, ... for \cswitch and \c& for \cnowait. I'm not sure if going for cryptic short commands is better or worse here. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: