Re: pg_execute_from_file review
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_execute_from_file review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87sjyh34dt.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_execute_from_file review (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_execute_from_file review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> writes: > My suggestion is to introduce pg_read_binary_file() function that can > read any files in the server, and make CREATE EXTENSION to use the > function. Of course, pg_execute_[sql|from]_file() can simplify queries It seems like all you're missing in the current patch is the encoding option in there. Exposing the internal functions is simple enough and solves it, but I much prefer the current simple-case user API. Do you want me to add a variant with an extra 'encoding' parameter? In this case, CREATE EXTENSION WITH ENCODING … would just use this variant internally. I'll send another version of the patch with the following SQL callable functions: - replace_placeholders(text, variadic placeholders[]) returns text- pg_read_binary_file(text, offset, length) returns bytea-pg_execute_sql_string(text)- pg_execute_sql_string(text, encoding)- pg_execute_sql_string(text, encoding, variadicplaceholders[])- pg_execute_sql_file(text)- pg_execute_sql_file(text, encoding)- pg_execute_sql_file(text, encoding,variadic placeholders[]) I'm not too sure about the EXECUTE syntax variant, are you talking about a plpgsql block (in which case that's supported for free) or about a new plain SQL variant of it? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: