Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87sjnymby9.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: > If we'd like to treat recovery.conf as if it's under the data directory, I'm > afraid that we should add complicated code to parse recovery.conf after > the value of data_directory has been determined from postgresql.conf. > Furthermore, what if recovery.conf has another setting of data_directory? We already do this dance for custom_variable_classes. IIRC the only thing you have to care about is setting the GUC before any other one. I guess you could just process the data_directory the same way, before the main loop, and be done with it. > Since recovery.conf is a configuration file, it's intuitive for me to put it > in configuration file directory rather than data directory. So I'm not inclined > to treat recovery.conf as if it's under data directory. Is this OK? I think that if we keep some compatibility with recovery.conf, then we need to include finding it in the data_directory or the configuration file directory, in that order, and with a LOG message that says where we did find it. I think we should *NOT* load both of them with some priority rules. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: