Re: curious regression failures
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: curious regression failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87r6kuh426.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: curious regression failures (was Re: [PATCHES] PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: curious regression failures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Looking back, by far the largest change in the period Sep 1 - Sep 11 was the lazy xid calculation and read-only transactions. That seems like the most likely culprit. But given Tom's comments this commit stands out too: Log Message: ----------- Release the exclusive lock on the table early after truncating it in lazy vacuum, instead of waiting till commit. Modified Files: -------------- pgsql/src/backend/commands: vacuumlazy.c (r1.92 -> r1.93) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c?r1=1.92&r2=1.93) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: