Re: Why are we waiting?
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why are we waiting? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87r6fope9l.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why are we waiting? ("Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why are we waiting?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM> writes: > for about 500users : > For about 700 Users: > At 1000 users This is a tangent but are these actual Postgres processes? What's the logic behind trying to run a 1,000 processes on a box with 16 cpus? They're all just going to be queuing up for i/o requests or sitting runnable waiting for a timeslice. Was this with your patch to raise the size of the clog lru? What is MaxBackends actually set to for the runs. Is it the same even when you're actually running with fewer backends? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB'sPostgreSQL training!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: