Re: Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87r2hffwda.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c
Re: Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: Andres> Hm, stb's results just for floating point isn't bad. The above Andres> numbers were for %f %f. But as the minimal usage would be about Andres> the internal usage of dopr(), here's comparing %.*f: Andres> snprintf time = 1324.87 ms total, 0.000264975 ms per iteration Andres> pg time = 1434.57 ms total, 0.000286915 ms per iteration Andres> stbsp time = 552.14 ms total, 0.000110428 ms per iteration Hmm. We had a case recently on IRC where the performance of float8out turned out to be the major bottleneck: a table of about 2.7 million rows and ~70 float columns showed an overhead of ~66 seconds for doing COPY as opposed to COPY BINARY (the actual problem report was that doing "select * from table" from R was taking a minute+ longer than expected, we got comparative timings for COPY just to narrow down causes). That translates to approx. 0.00035 ms overhead (i.e. time(float8out) - time(float8send)) per conversion (Linux server, hardware unknown). That 66 seconds was the difference between 18s and 1m24s, so it wasn't a small factor but totally dominated the query time. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: