Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87psad156u.fsf@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum ("Jim Nasby" <jim.nasby@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim Nasby" <jim.nasby@enterprisedb.com> writes: > How about... > > ALTER TABLE ... > ALTER AUTOVACUUM [ THRESHOLD | SCALE | COST DELAY | COST LIMIT ] > ALTER AUTOANALYZE [ THRESHOLD | SCALE ] > > ... or would that create a whole bunch of reserved words? The way to predict when you're going to run into conflicts in a case like this is to ask what happens if you have a column named "autovacuum" or "autoanalyze"... Sometimes the parser can look ahead to the next keyword to determine which production to use but usually you're best off just looking for a grammatical construct that doesn't look ambiguous even to a naive human reader. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: