Re: PL/PgSQL buglet / doc error
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/PgSQL buglet / doc error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87n0ok7wfy.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/PgSQL buglet / doc error (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes: > On 7 Nov 2002, Neil Conway wrote: > > If you have declared the function to return void, then the expression > > can be omitted, and will be ignored in any case. > > I'm not sure how you translated the above to return is optional. I'd > read it as the expression portion of the return statement is optional if > the function returns void. Thus you can say return; for the return > because the expression is optional. Woops :-) There might be a case to be made for actually implementing this (not requiring a blank RETURN at the end of a function body if the function doesn't return anything), but the original "bug" is obviously a case of my misreading the docs. Sorry for the noise. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: