Re: streaming result sets: progress
| От | Nic Ferrier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: streaming result sets: progress |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87n0o49f6w.fsf@pooh-sticks-bridge.tapsellferrier.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: streaming result sets: progress (Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: streaming result sets: progress
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu> writes: > Yes, proccess increase with result from server and diferent is that > C request less memory - in C we can execute big qyery than Java > I can't believe that we must complete query in memory, but it is true > Excuse me If you look at the implementation of the libpq library you'll see that it's exactly the same as the java one: the query is done and then all the rows are retrieved and kept in memory. If you're able to do it in C it's because C has slightly more efficient memory handling than Java does. It must also mean that your machine has just too little memory for your Java app, if I were you I'd just buy some more RAM as a quick fix to your problem. Another alternative is to create 2 connections and use a cursor in one. Or to package your update operations as stored procs operating over the large results. Nic
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: