Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87mzim5psy.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Online backup vs Continuous backup (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I noticed that we are using the term "Online Backup" in our > documentation when we are talking about continuous backup and PITR. > > To me, "online backup" is doing a backup while the system is online > (online-backup), and that is accomplished by pg_dump. Well fwiw what pg_dump does isn't even considered a "backup" at all in other systems. It's a "logical export" or something of that sort. It's not considered a "backup" because it's saving something different than the actual physical database. When you restore you get something (hopefully) logically equivalent but still physically different. Hot backups which is what you read "online backup" to mean is pretty closely tied to PITR log archiving backups. One isn't very useful without the other. Specifically, you can have all the archived logs in the world but if you don't have a backup to start from they're useless. And in postgres I gather hot backups aren't very useful if you don't have the transaction logs necessary to fix any torn pages. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: