Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
От | Tollef Fog Heen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87mxzg8cpz.fsf@qurzaw.linpro.no обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq (daveg <daveg@sonic.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
]] daveg | I disagree. I have clients who have problems with leftover client connections | due to server host failures. They do not write apps in C. For a non-default | change to be effective we would need to have all the client drivers, eg JDBC, | psycopg, DBD-DBI, and the apps like psql make changes to turn it on. Adding | this option as a non-default will not really help. FWIW, this is my case. My application uses psycopg, which provides no way to get access to the underlying socket. Sure, I could hack my way around this, but from the application writer's point of view, I have a connection that I expect to stay around and be reliable. Whether that connection is over a UNIX socket, a TCP socket or something else is something I would rather not have to worry about; it feels very much like an abstraction violation. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: