Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87llqoyr8o.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Another idea --- if fsync() is slow because it can't find the dirty > buffers, use write() to write the buffers, copy the buffer to local > memory, mark it as clean, then open the file with O_SYNC and write > it again. Yuck. Do we have any idea how many kernels are out there that implement fsync() as poorly as HPUX apparently does? I'm just wondering if we're contemplating spending a whole lot of effort to work around a bug that is only present on an (old?) version of HPUX. Do typical BSD derived kernels exhibit this behavior? What about Linux? Solaris? -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: