Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
От | Florian Weimer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87lkwgb4lg.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
* Marc G. Fournier: > according to FreeBSD ports: > > subversion uses it > openldap server uses it And the latter is really crucial and they could hardly switch to anything else without losing credibility. Sleepycat also has got an impressive customer list: <http://www.sleepycat.com/customers/customerlist.html> Most of these companies already have to deal with Oracle, though. 8-/ > So, if you are going to be "concerned" about any of Oracle's > acquisitions, one should just look at their own desktop/servers to see > how much the SleepyCat one will potentially affect them :( I'm running a custom-written database on top of Berkeley DB (which I plan to migrate to PostgreSQL for the sake of ad-hoc queries), and I'm not *that* concerned. I'm using Sleepycat's copyleft licensing option, and nobody can take that copy away from me. Your mail servers are probably similar: the copyleft license you already have is good enough.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: