Re: Performance Problem
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance Problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87lkeycyry.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance Problem ("Gauri Kanekar" <meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Gauri Kanekar" <meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com> writes: > Befor doing vaccum full on the database this query use to take less > than 4min. But now after doing vacumming reindexing the tables it is > taking 73mins. Vacuum full is generally not necessary. You do need to ensure regular vacuum is run frequently on heavily updated tables though. > After observing the explain analyse it seems like it is not selecting > the required index properly. > > So can anybody suggest any thing?? -> Bitmap Index Scan on campaign_attributes_pk (cost=0.00..105.83 rows=60 width=0) (actual time=1.721..1.721 rows=1279loops=1) When's the last time you analyzed your tables? Postgres is guessing it'll find 60 rows and instead finding over a thousands rows... -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: