Re: transaction problem using cursors
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: transaction problem using cursors |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87lkeqxvx4.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: transaction problem using cursors ("Pit M." <fmi-soft@gmx.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: transaction problem using cursors
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Pit M." <fmi-soft@gmx.de> writes: > The goal is to maintain a valid cursor that can be used to FETCH other records. > It would be ideal to skip this record an continue fetching the next record -> > but how can i achieve this? Well ideally the answer would be to wrap each FETCH in a savepoint and roll back to the savepoint if it fails. However I just tried it and this doesn't work. So I think the answer is you can't, sorry. One alternative would be to store the result set in a temporary table with an index on it. Then you could execute a separate query for each record you want to look up and wrap that query in a savepoint if you want to do it in a transaction and recover from errors. It wouldn't have the same performance profile as using a cursor. It would use more resources in most cases and the lookups will be slower. Though if you keep this data around for a long time you might actually be better off since you could use a real non-temporary table and not be forced to keep around transactions for long periods of time tying up other resources. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: