Re: ARC patent
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87fz0zsng1.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ARC patent ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> >IBM can NEVER sue customers for using infringing > >code before first informing them of infringement and > >giving reasonable time to upgrade to uninfringing > >version. That's not true. If you *knowingly* violated a patent IBM can sue you for the damages caused. If you weren't aware of the patent then IBM can only ask you to cease the infringement and can only then sue for damages caused after that point in time. Though in the given situation I don't see how IBM could argue any damages. It's not like they have any licensing business for ARC nor would anyone be willing to pay for a license to ARC. There are plenty of other algorithms that are perfectly passable. Of course, IANAL and all that. But I'm sure legal advice from this mailing list is worth every penny you've paid for it :) "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@www.commandprompt.com> writes: > I can see it now: > > We won't sue you (customer) but you have to upgrade > to DB2 ;) Heh. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: