Re: PseudoPartitioning and agregates
| От | Greg Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PseudoPartitioning and agregates |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87fywb8h7k.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PseudoPartitioning and agregates (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > > > How hard would it be to have Postgres actually remove the gettimeofday > > overhead from the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output? > > Personally, I dislike measurement tools that lie to you under the flag > of producing more-easily-interpreted results. This is pretty standard practice for profilers in other contexts. > As an example of why this would be a bad idea, the total time would no > longer be closely related to the actual elapsed time (as measured by > psql's \timing for instance) so you would be entirely unable to tell > whether there was some significant factor not being measured. Well that would be easily remedied by printing the total overhead subtracted from all the nodes after the plan. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: