Re: CLUSTER and MVCC
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER and MVCC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87fy8e4mgd.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CLUSTER and MVCC (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CLUSTER and MVCC
Re: CLUSTER and MVCC |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Csaba Nagy" <nagy@ecircle-ag.com> writes: > Wouldn't be possible to do it like Simon (IIRC) suggested, and add a > parameter to enable/disable the current behavior, and use the MVCC > behavior as default ? Doing it in CLUSTER would be weird. However perhaps it would be useful to have some sort of stand-alone tool that just bumped all the xmin/xmax's. It would have to be super-user-only and carry big warning labels saying it breaks MVCC. But it would be useful any time you have a table that you want to exempt a particular table from serializable snapshots. Basically a per-table way to force a read-committed snapshot on. Though, actually it's not quite a read-committed snapshot is it? Anyone using an old serializable snapshot will see what, no tuples at all? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: