Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87eklx2j2j.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Chris <list@1006.org> writes: > > I've compiled 8.0 beta 1 on a R5900 V3.1 (a playstation 2) running > > Linux (PS2 Linux 1) for portability testing. > > ... > > I'm wondering: would it be hard to fix the assembly spinlock code > > for the R5900? > > According to the previous port report from Red Hat, the PS2 chip simply > doesn't have any user-space TAS instruction, so you're pretty much stuck. > If you can find something that works, let us know. Out of curiosity. If it lacks a tas instruction, is there really any smp implementation that runs on it? Why would postgres want spinlocks at all with only one processor? -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: