Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87d6qmqk9n.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> writes: > Ya, I have read this before. The problem here is that I'm not aware of > which AIO implementation on Linux is the forerunner nor do I have any > idea how it's implementation or performance details defer from that of > other implementations on other platforms. The implementation of AIO in 2.5 is the one by Ben LaHaise (not SGI). Not sure what the performance is like -- although it's been merged into 2.5 already, so someone can do some benchmarking. Can anyone suggest a good test? Keep in mind that glibc has had a user-space implementation for a little while (although I'd guess the performance to be unimpressive), so AIO would not be *that* kernel-version specific. > Anyone have any idea of Red Hat's Advanced Server uses KAIO or what? RH AS uses Ben LaHaise's implemention of AIO, I believe. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: