Re: Experimental ARC implementation
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experimental ARC implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87d6c3ly7c.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Experimental ARC implementation (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Experimental ARC implementation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I am not really aiming at removing sync() alltogether. We know already > > that open,fsync,close does not guarantee you flush dirty OS-buffers for > > which another process might so far only have done open,write. And you So for what it's worth, though the spec seems to indicate fsync is only guaranteed to sync writes to that file descriptor, in reality all known VFS's do not associated dirty buffers with particular file descriptors. At least I checked with people that NetBSD and Solaris do not. Both developers said they were unaware of any OS that kept dirty buffers per-fd and couldn't imagine anyone wanting to do that. It would be fairly easy to check Linux. All the others out there are fairly closely related to either NetBSD or Solaris. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: