Re: TODO questions
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87d5o3dk0i.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO questions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > That all sounds nice, but unless you intend to fix all the constraints > that force some values to be set-only-at-postmaster-start, it's never > going to be possible to promise that a reload has the same effect as > restarting the server. We could do this for values that are not > PGC_POSTMASTER, but the argument given above for doing it is bogus. Well that's true, that's a limitation of Postgres's reloading config files. Certainly I think it should be a goal to avoid any such guc variables where it's worth the effort. That doesn't mean you have to make the "problem" worse and go in a completely different direction. I would say it would be reasonable to print a warning if loading the new config file results in a different value for any guc variable that can't be changed. If that's too awkward then at least it would be nice to put a warning line in the initial default config file to mark any such guc variables. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: