Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87d5eu1lkz.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes: > > Whereas it shouldn't be hard to prove that this is equivalent: > > > > stark=> explain select col1 from test group by upper(col1),col1 order by upper(col1); > > QUERY PLAN > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Group (cost=88.50..98.23 rows=200 width=32) > > -> Sort (cost=88.50..91.58 rows=1230 width=32) > > Sort Key: upper(col1), col1 > > -> Seq Scan on test (cost=0.00..25.38 rows=1230 width=32) > > (4 rows) > > I don't think you can assume that that will be true for any locale. If there > are two different characters that both have the same uppercase version, this > will break things. No it won't. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: