Re: Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87d53k8sqa.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > * is_top_level: TRUE if command is being driven directly from > exec_simple_query or exec_execute_message, else FALSE (this would > need to be passed through PortalRun, so it gets this parameter added > too). ... > The point of adding is_top_level is to provide a simpler, more reliable > means for PreventTransactionChain and related functions to detect > whether a function is trying to invoke a non-transaction-block-safe > command. Currently we rely on an ugly test involving seeing if the > statement node is in the QueryContext, but that's always been a kluge, > and I'm not sure that it works 100% even today. I'd like to get rid > of the QueryContext global altogether. I'm not exactly following. How does the exec_simple_query or exec_execute_message tell you whether you're in a transaction? Can't you exec_simple_query("BEGIN;") and then exec_simple_query a second query in the same transaction? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: