Re: 8.4 Performance improvements: was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Alan Stange <stange@rentec.com> writes:
>> Gregory Stark wrote:
>>> AFAIK Opensolaris doesn't implement posix_fadvise() so there's no benefit.
>
>> It's implemented.   I'm guessing it's not what you want to see though:
>> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/port/gen/posix_fadvise.c
>
> Ugh.  So apparently, we actually need to special-case Solaris to not
> believe that posix_fadvise works, or we'll waste cycles uselessly
> calling a do-nothing function.  Thanks, Sun.

Do we? Or do we just document that setting effective_cache_size on Solaris
won't help?

I'm leaning towards the latter because I expect Sun will implement this and
there will be people running 8.4 on newer versions of the OS long after it's
out.


--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!