Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion
От | Arseny Sher |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87d1d9xmyf.fsf@ispras.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> While I admire your fearlessness, I think the chances of you being > able to bring a project of this type to a successful conclusion are > remote. Here is what I said about this topic previously: > > http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoa=kzHJ+TwxyQ+vKu21nk3prkRjSdbhjubN7qvc8UKuGg@mail.gmail.com Well, as I said, I don't pretend that I will support full functionality: >> instead, we should decide which part of this work (if any) is >> going to be done in the course of GSoC. Probably, all TPC-H queries >> with and without index support is a good initial target, but this >> needs to be discussed. I think that successfull completion of this project should be a clear and justified answer to the question "Is this idea is good enough to work on merging it into the master?", not the production-ready patches themselves. Nevertheless, of course project success criterion must be reasonably formalized -- e.g. implement nodes X with features Y, etc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: