Re: why memoize is not used for correlated subquery
От | Andy Fan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why memoize is not used for correlated subquery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87cyp6s1qw.fsf@163.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why memoize is not used for correlated subquery (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I imagined making this work by delaying the plan creation for > subqueries until the same time as create_plan() for the outer query. Do you mean sublinks rather than subqueries? if so, we can get another benefit I want very much. explain (costs off) select * from t1 where t1.a = 1 and exists (select 1 from t2 where t2.a = t1.a and random() > 0); QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Seq Scan on t1 Filter: ((a = 1) AND EXISTS(SubPlan 1)) SubPlan 1 -> Seq Scan on t2 Filter: ((a = t1.a) AND (random() > '0'::double precision)) As for now, when we are planing the sublinks, we don't know t1.a = 1 which may lost some optimization chance. Considering the t2.a is a partition key of t2, this would yield some big improvement for planning a big number of partitioned table. -- Best Regards Andy Fan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: