Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87bs61kli3.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases (Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
[ pgsql-patches removed from Cc: list ] Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk> writes: > I am trying to add some replication features to postgres (yes, I have > already looked at ongoing work), in a peer to peer manner. Did you look at the research behind Postgres-R, and the pgreplication stuff? > - When a frontend process sends a read query, each backend process > does that from its own data area. Surely that's not correct -- a SELECT can be handled by *any one* node, not each and every one, right? > - There are two types of write queries. Postmasters use seperate > communication channels for each. One is the sequencial channel which > carries writes whose order is important, and the non-sequencial > channel carries write queries whose order is not important. How do you distinguish between these? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: