Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87bqnlvfov.fsf@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > vacuum_freeze_min The latest TransactionId that will be "frozen" during > a VACUUM is calculated by CurrentTransactionId - vacuum_freeze_min. > > vacuum_freeze_max > The maximum age, calculated as distance from CurrentTransactionId, that > will be allowed before a autovacuum will be forced for that database > object. I think it's clearer if "min" and "max" are considered adjectives and always have a subject they modify. Otherwise it's unclear what they refer to. So "vacuum_freeze_min_age" and "vacuum_freeze_max_age" instead. That way it's unambiguous which is which. Ie, that it's minimum and maximum age and not minimum and maximum transaction id which would be the other way around. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: