Question about tuplestore clients
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Question about tuplestore clients |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87bqinj2ks.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Question about tuplestore clients
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I tried to make tuplestore free up tuples that would no longer be needed because they're older than the mark and neither random access nor rewind capability was needed. This is important for three different purposes: optimizing merge join to not need to materialize the entire data set, recursive queries, and window functions. However I've run into something I didn't expect. It seems merge joins keep a reference to a tuple *after* they set the mark beyond it. I'm trying to figure out why this is necessary but I haven't absorbed all of nodeMergejoin yet. Is it possible I've misdiagnosed this? I think my logic is correct because if I ifdef out the pfree it passes all regression tests. That doesn't really prove anything of course but it seems hard to believe I would have an off-by-one bug in setting the mark that wouldn't show up in the results. But in my reading of nodeMergejoin so far it seems it keeps a reference to the first tuple in a set, ie, the tuple it's going to mark. Not any tuple before that. Anyways, I just wanted to know if I was missing some other reason references have to be valid for older tuples. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: