Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
От | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGCon 2008 RFP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87bpula274.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGCon 2008 RFP (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
gmr@myyearbook.com ("Gavin M. Roy") writes: > Personally, the only argument I see for standardization is it makes > the conference feel more professional. Having been to a fair > amount of conferences, I'm more impressed by the ones that put an > emphasis on the polish of the event, matching collateral materials > (logos, signage, > etc). Obviously content is king, but second to > content is how the content is conveyed, the design image of a > conference. I'll suggest different "prime value" to this sort of standardization... Standardizing formats means that you *might* more readily be able to produce a single, somewhat-uniform-looking, document combining all the material together. Conference proceedings are the more typical example of attempts to "standardize format;" having common format means that they can publish *THAT* as a "book" and not have it look like a dog's breakfast. The PostgreSQL-related conferences aren't formal enough for that sort of imposition to seem at all reasonable. We're generally not in the sort of academic "publish-or-perish" peril that would force the presenters to go to that particular sort of effort. I would suggest that, for our purposes, there is a value in NOT attempting standardization, namely that we haven't anything resembling the degree of infrastructure required to support production of a sufficiently "all-encompassing" standardized format. We don't (yet ;-)) have in-place upgrades beteween versions; I'd *much* rather that "systematizing efforts" went into that. If we had someone around that was a graphic arts "guru" who wanted to put together some nice looking PowerPoint/Keynote/OOImpress templates, I don't imagine anyone would say "Don't do it!" But I don't think it's worth looking *hard* for that, or in trying to impose burdens surrounding this on presenters. I don't believe that a lack of "collateral matching" is our largest problem :-). -- output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "acm.org") http://cbbrowne.com/info/ Chaotic Evil means never having to say you're sorry.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: